/en/ - General

Take it easy!

Posting mode: Reply
Visit J-List - Your Favorite Online Shop and Friend in Japan
Get the Newest Figures from J-List - Your Favorite Online Shop and Friend in Japan

[]
05/21/24 Happy birthday hikari3! (News post)
12/21/23 Recent news post: Check here. Also, new board added: /i/ - Oekaki.
11/25/23 Accepting banner submissions; check this thread for more details.
11/17/23 New blotter! Use this to keep an eye for small updates.
[Show All]


Merry Christmas!


(24.42 KB 219x230 IMG_0363.jpeg)
Anonymous 10/28/2024 (Mon) 06:17:25 No. 6222
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two fractions, does that mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities? And an infinite number of those infinities? And an infinite number of those infinities? And…(infinitely times. And that infinitely times. And that infinitely times. And that infinitely times. And…) continues forever. And that continues forever. And that continues forever. And that continues forever. And that continues forever. And…(…)… How do you define the natural numbers without infinity?
>>
Actually the largest natural number is determined by the bitwise width of integers in our simulation. Bignums don't count
>>
>>6222 this is an idea addressed by combinatorics also to answer your question about natural numbers being defined without infinity, you can expression natural numbers as either 0 or the successor of a natural number for example, 4 would be defined/encoded as successor(successor(successor(successor(0)))), which can be extended ad infinitum you also have von neumann natural numbers where natural numbers are sets and their cardinality encodes their value, eg, ø = 0, {ø} = 1, {ø, {ø}} = 2, {ø, {ø}, {ø, {ø}}} = 3 and so on also if you wanna be extra fancy, natural numbers can also be defined by church encoding and beta-reduction, λα.λβ.λγ.M can be reduced 3 times therefore it encodes 3, M itself cannot be reduced (atleast, we assume) therefore it encodes 0, if we suppose we have abstraction binding (like f := λx.M) we can encode infinity using infinite recursion and self applying abstractions
>>
(52.83 KB 600x348 Hypercubes.jpg)
>>6222 I'm 60% sure this is how the 11 dimensions work picrel.... I think


Quick Reply